
【国外标准】 Standard Practice for Preparation of Biomass for Compositional Analysis
本网站 发布时间:
2024-02-28
开通会员免费在线看70000余条国内标准,赠送文本下载次数,单本最低仅合13.3元!还可享标准出版进度查询、定制跟踪推送、标准查新等超多特权!  
查看详情>>

适用范围:
4.1 Preparation Method A—Method suitable for the preparation of large quantities (>20 g) of field collected samples into a form appropriate for compositional analysis. Woody samples must first be available as chips of a nominal 5 by 5 by 0.6 cm (2 by 2 by 1/4 in.) or less and twigs not exceeding 0.6 cm (1/4 in.) diameter. Herbaceous materials may be processed as whole straw. It is recommended that wastepaper should be shredded into pieces less then 1 cm (1/2 in.) wide. Furthermore, it is recommended that twigs, straw, and wastepaper should not exceed 61 cm (24 in.) in length to facilitate handling.4.2 Preparation Methods B and C—Methods are suitable for very moist feedstocks, samples that would not be stable during prolonged exposure to ambient conditions, or for drying materials when room conditions deviate from the ambient conditions described in 3.1.1. These test methods are also suitable for handling small samples of biomass (<20 g). The drying step is done in a convection oven at 45 °C (Test Method B) or by lyophilization (Test Method C).4.3 Preparation Methods A, B, and C are not intended for materials that will already pass through a 20 mesh sieve or that cannot be dried by the described methods to a total solids content of greater than 85 %, based on an oven dried weight.4.4 Preparation Method A will separate the milled material into two fractions, a −20/+80 mesh fraction and a −80 mesh fraction.4.4.1 Extraneous inorganic materials will accumulate in the −80 mesh fraction and it should be analyzed independently from the −20/+80 mesh fraction. Weighted results from the two fractions can then be combined to obtain results for materials on an "as received" basis.NOTE 1: During analysis, the very fine consistency of the −80 mesh fraction may cause problems in filtering operations and should be handled appropriately.4.5 Preparation Method D—Method suitable for cereal grains, cereal grain fermentation mash, cereal grain fermentation beer, and cereal grain fermentation residues that are generally stable.4.6 Preparation Method E—Method suitable for cereal grains, cereal grain fermentation mash, cereal grain fermentation beer, and cereal grain fermentation residues that are biologically or enzymatically active.1.1 This practice covers a reproducible way to convert hardwoods, softwoods, herbaceous materials (such as switchgrass and sericea), agricultural residues (such as corn stover, wheat straw, and bagasse), wastepaper (such as office waste, boxboard, and newsprint), cellulosic feedstocks pretreated to improve suitability for fermentation, cereal grains, cereal grain fermentation mash, cereal grain fermentation beer, and fermentation residues into a uniform material suitable for compositional analysis. This practice is intended for samples that need to be dried prior to analysis.1.2 Milling and sieving actions both produce large amounts of dust. This dust can be a nuisance hazard and irritant. Use appropriate respiratory protection as needed. If excessive amounts of dust are allowed to become airborne a potential explosion hazard is possible. Provide appropriate dust control measures as needed.1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses after SI units are provided for information only and are not considered standard.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
标准号:
ASTM E1757-19
标准名称:
Standard Practice for Preparation of Biomass for Compositional Analysis
英文名称:
Standard Practice for Preparation of Biomass for Compositional Analysis标准状态:
Active-
发布日期:
-
实施日期:
出版语种:
- 推荐标准
- ASTM D817-12(2019) Standard Test Methods of Testing Cellulose Acetate Propionate and Cellulose Acetate Butyrate
- ASTM D8170-20 Standard Guide for Using Disposable Handheld Soil Core Samplers for the Collection and Storage of Soil for Volatile Organic Analysis
- ASTM D8171-18 Standard Test Methods for Density Determination of Flax Fiber
- ASTM D8174-18 Standard Test Method for Finite Flash Point Determination of Liquid Wastes by Small-Scale Closed Cup Tester
- ASTM D8176-18(2023) Standard Test Method for Mechanically Tapped Density of Activated Carbon (Powdered and Fine Mesh)
- ASTM D8180-23 Standard Specification for Rerefined Mineral Insulating Liquid Used in Electrical Apparatus
- ASTM D8181-19 Standard Specification for Microemulsion Blendstock for Preparing Microemulsion Test Fuel Oils
- ASTM D8186-18 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Impurities in Graphite by Electrothermal Vaporization Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ETV-ICP OES)
- ASTM D8188-23 Standard Test Method for Determination of Density and Relative Density of Asphalt, Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials, and Soft-Tar Pitch by Use of a Digital Density Meter (U-Tube)
- ASTM D8192-23 Standard Test Method for Hardness in Colored and Colorless Water
- ASTM D8195-18 Standard Classification System and Basis for Specification for Polyethylene Terephthalate Film and Sheeting
- ASTM D8198-18 Standard Specification for Hydraulically Applied 100 % Wood Fiber Mulches
- ASTM D8199-20 Standard Test Method for Determining the Specific Strength of Hydraulically Applied Fiber Matrix Products for Erosion Control
- ASTM D820-93(2023) Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Soaps Containing Synthetic Detergents
- ASTM D8200-22 Standard Practice for Creating a Correlation to Compare Particle Size Distribution Results of Proppants by Dynamic Imaging Analyzers and Sieves